Thoughts on the Journey

Earlier this week I was drawn to re-watch the film Into the Wild. I like this movie not only because the poem, “I Go Back to May 1937”  by Sharon Olds is quoted, but also because at times I can relate to the desire to go off and tough it out on my own.  I admire McCandless for his ability to focus solely on what he felt he needed to do – to abandon society and live off the grid, with integrity and purpose.  He went into the wild not just physically, but also mentally, and one of the quotes we have from him is a realization that he probably did not expect to make on his solo journey:  Happiness is only real when shared.

A wonderful article on relationship in the Buddhist mag Tricycle, “No Gain,” by Barry Magid, gives insight to relationships and how they have the potential to help us grow.  As someone who values independence and solitude, I often find myself fantasizing about going quasi-Kerouac.  After all, when people (either close or acquaintances) hurt or disappoint me, my gut reaction is just to determine that I don’t need that person in my life anyway (much like McCandless’s approach to his parents and what he viewed as a sick society).  So when I read the following quote on relationships, I was taken aback: With the strategy (or curative fantasy) of autonomy, we go in the opposite direction and try to imagine that we don’t need anyone. But that strategy inevitably entails repression or dissociation, a denial of feeling.  It seems my rationalization of getting through life by excluding others who disappoint me is a “curative fantasy”!  After reflecting on that (and the opposite, which is trying to control people and thinking we will be “fixed” if they would only do what we want them to), I realized that I have to embrace that a paradox exists.  We cannot expect others to fix our problems by attempting to control their actions; nor can we exclude everyone from our lives and assume we will be okay totally alone.  As Magid articulates, To open yourself up to need, longing, dependency, and reliance on others means opening yourself to the truth that none of us can do this on our own.   We need one another to help us through life.  Paradoxically, this means that opening ourselves to up to others also means that people will, at times, fail us.

We all have a dark side, or shadow, just as life has its light and its darkness, which brings me to the Jungian view.  “In Spiritual Maturity, Individuation, and Bright Shadow,” The Rose, Issue 19, Jeremy Taylor (Unitarian Universalist, dream worker) shares that Carl Jung believed the difference between a mature religion/spiritual practice and an immature one is its attitude to paradox.  The more developed religion or practice does not attempt to eliminate paradox with dogma, but instead allows the praticione[r] to remain open-minded, open-hearted…(10). In relationships, there can be much good, much support, much love that one can receive, but simultaneously the opposite can also be delivered.  Situations in life are similar – great things can happen, awful things can happen.  Suffering and darkness exist.  Both are part of life, cannot be avoided, and ultimately as Taylor states, the very worst experiences are in fact potential bridges to the very best outcome.  Yes, it is hard to stomach at times, I admit.  But the truth is there.  Weren’t those teachers who were the toughest on us some of the best with which we studied?  Is it not the most profoundly distressing situation that forces us to look deep inside and make changes or at least stark revelations about ourselves?

In her poem, “I Go Back to May 1937,” Olds talks to her parents, who are seen as they graduate from college, having yet given birth to their daughter.  She writes,

I want to go up to them and say Stop,
don’t do it – she’s the wrong woman,
he’s the wrong man, you are going to do things
you cannot imagine you would ever do,
you are going to do bad things to children,
you are going to suffer in ways you have not heard of…

But, even having suffered through the “bad things,” the poet does not stop her parents from their union. Her reason?  I want to live.  To live means we get through the suffering.  To live means we are open-minded to the paradox that people/situations in life will both help us and hurt us.  To live means acknowledging that life will be a mix of joy and pain.  And, if we have the ability to hold this paradox up and let it exist as is, then we become a more whole person. We can experience the happiness that is most real when shared – with others and with a developed Self that can hold the tension of human existence in a most balanced way. The thing is, it’s a process.  It takes community to get through life.  We can’t do it all alone, on a bus in the wild, or holed up in our writing corner.  Life here on earth is a mix.  It’s a gift most enjoyed when shared in a myriad of ways.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Thoughts on the Journey

  1. This is a difficult lesson I am still learning. The way you are responding to the words and experience of others reveals your insight and understanding of Jung, the paradox and relationship. Also your willingness – no, eagerness – to walk through the brambles (and worse) in order to smell the roses.

    Like

  2. Ain’t it the truth! Cant have joy without suffering. Wouldn’t be able to see the light, if we didn’t have darkness. Sometimes that abrasive inconvenience in relationship is what creates the pearl.

    Love you sister, Susan

    Like

  3. very good, rosemary. tough stuff and reaffirms “be true to thine own self.” God’s ( supreme being), “the mother on the other side of the world” James Baker Hall’s title of one of his book of poems.[pick one]….’s intention in every being is emotional evolution of attitude: volcanic, indemnified, reiterated, distilled,redeemed,- big words, still… Sharon’s glad she’s here and so am I. I’ve offered all that I am to all whose path I’ve crossed by being Me. dared to love and offer consideration, caring attitude : usually ignored, slap in the face, through tremendous disappointment.still, necessary to be 100% fred, can’t be anything else.

    Like

  4. Rosemary, Wonderful observations here, and a fine list of sources too. If you’ve never read Helen Luke’s seminal take on Jung, you might want to give it a try. She’s written a wonderful collection of essays that address a great many of Jung’s insights and is embraced by Marion Woodman for her insights into the process of individuation an what it means to the individual, most directly in her book on Dante’s, “Divine Comedy.” George Schricker

    Like

  5. Human beings are social creatures — no matter how hard we assert our anti-socialism. We crave relationships. A completely solitary existence only leads to madness.

    The British have removed solitary confinement from their penal system as they have deemed it detrimental to the concept of rehabilitation.

    Humans can damn near accomplish anything as long as no one cares who gets the credit.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s